Packaging compliance software: what the tools can and can’t do
As PPWR documentation and US state EPR reporting pile up, packaging teams are buying LCA, EPR and AI tools. Here’s how to tell them apart.
As PPWR documentation and US state EPR reporting pile up, packaging teams are buying LCA, EPR and AI tools. Here’s how to tell them apart.
A stay in Lollicup’s Oregon EPR lawsuit sends the fight to the Ninth Circuit. The informal pause on enforcement has lapsed, and compliance obligations continue regardless.
PPWR paperwork, PFAS testing backlogs and a fragmented US EPR landscape are pushing packaging teams toward software. Here’s what the tools actually do.
A federal court upholds Oregon’s packaging EPR law, California’s SB 54 and SB 343 face expanding litigation, and Minnesota’s PFAS data show measurable compliance gains.
Parliament’s environment committee backed easing the PPWR’s authorised representative duty, but only for small EU firms. The underlying obligation still stands today.
Two months after the PPWR took effect, MEPs scale back EU-wide EPR relief to SMEs, PFAS limits lack an agreed test method, and buyers want proof in contracts.
California’s recyclability labeling law hit its October 4 compliance date, but a federal injunction blocks state enforcement. Private litigation risk remains.
Every packaging type sold in the EU now needs a signed declaration of conformity backed by technical documentation. Here’s what that actually requires.
LCA software, EPR reporting platforms, recyclability checkers, digital product passports and AI quoting tools are multiplying. Here’s what each does, and its limits.
Legal challenges to state EPR laws advance in federal court as Washington launches battery rules, California vetoes a labeling bill, and federal PFAS legislation returns to Congress.